Stoneham Town Election: April 2, 2024

Hello Stoneham voters! The daffodils are up, the sun is shining, and it’s time to go to Town Hall and elect our representatives for another year! I’ve been impressed at the transformation of the information available to voters in the 16 years since I first gazed in dismay at a local ballot with absolutely no idea who the candidates were or what they stood for. So much more is now available, mostly through the hard work of our local civil servants. But for those of you who still text me asking how I’m planning on voting, here’s the breakdown!

First some resources:
Election Tuesday April 2nd, 2024 7AM-8PM at Town Hall
Sample Ballot
Candidate Statements
Candidate forum
I also read the candidate statements in the Stoneham Independent.

Now for my picks:
YES:
Raymie Parker has been serving Stoneham for several years. It’s difficult, time consuming and thankless work that probably pays way less per hour than snow shoveling for the DPW. She’s always been thoughtful, prepared, present, hard working, honest – really everything you would ask for in a decision maker for the town. I appreciate that she continues to innovate and is very available to hear perspectives and concerns.

David Pignone is also a candidate for re-election. I have seen less of his work up front than I have Raymie’s, but his reputation and service in the community is deep, and with his work in the schools he has a front row seat in some of the big challenges facing our structures.

NO:
Stephen Ternullo (no publicly available site). I drive past his house regularly, and while I’m glad he recently took down the “F**K BIDEN” signs (note that his did not include asterisks) he still has up several similar signs using language I was not allowed to use growing up. His tag line on the yard signs is “I will be your voice” but I don’t have a potty mouth so I’m not sure that’s true. I do not want a town government that is uncivil, and the face he puts forward to his community is not one that speaks to collaboration or with whom I think it would be easy to work.

Robert Verner (no publicly available site). For this candidate, I rely on the information in the candidate statements. Our community will be opening a brand new high school in the fall, and a lot of his statements were around starving that school of resources – which is a bit like buying a new car and then not driving it because you don’t want to spend gas money. Cutting resources was pretty much the only thing he talked about, which actually seems wasteful to me given how much we’ve already invested.


I would love to be able to offer guidance on the Constable race, but I have no insights there. So if anyone has any thoughts, please drop a comment! See you at the ballot box on Tuesday!

Stoneham 2021 April Ballot

This year was particularly difficult, not just because of the pandemic but because all the candidates seem like excellent folks we should be pleased and proud to have serve our community. I hate to feel like I’m voting “against” any of them! May Stoneham always be so lucky to have this be our set of choices! That said, I think more than ever it’s tough to make a decision between folks so qualified, and I hope that the candidates not elected this time will consider serving again.

Here’s the sample ballot:
https://www.stoneham-ma.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3242/Sample-Town-Election-Ballot

Select Board:
Raymie Parker
Robert Lawler

Rationale:
I have been impressed with Raymie’s work on the Selectboard since she was first elected. In a role like this, I think that a mix of experience in how to get things done and optimism things can change are an ideal mix for a board, and Raymie has both.

The choice between Robert Lawler and David Pignone was a harder one. In the end, it came down to access and communication. I strongly believe that Stoneham is best served by a Selectboard that serves all 20,000+ residents of the town, not just the few thousand who are already well connected. David’s communications to people outside the already well established channels weren’t as strong as Robert’s (Robert did a number of open Zoom forums). David also did not respond to my requests to talk to him about his candidacy, where Robert reached out to me several times. I think Robert’s background and experience are good and a good mix with the current board. I’m hopeful if elected he would continue to serve all the residents of the town well. So in my final decision, I give Robert Lawler the edge.

School Committee (full term)
Jaime Wallace
Melanie Fiore

I’m grateful for George Georgountzos for his continued interest in serving the town, but his educational experience and commitment is considerably less than Jaime (the incumbent) or Melanie Fiore (who has significant volunteering bona fides, and is serving an appointed role now).

School Committee (part term) – SUPER HARD CHOICE
Rati Chaudari-Murray

OK, this was by far the hardest choice! I want both Rati and Betty! They both have great backgrounds in education, and they both have a wonderful perspective to offer to Stoneham! Their outreach and platforms are similar. I really wrestled with this one! At the end, I finally leaned towards Rati, in part because of her experience with special needs kids, which is so important to vulnerable members of our community. Making sure our schools are addressing the needs of ALL our children is a critical contribution.

All other races are uncontested.

My ballot: Stoneham Election April 2, 2019

I regret that I have not had the time this year to write up an in-depth review of the candidates. But I’ve had a number of people asking who I’m voting for, and I’m generally excited and enthusiastic about the candidates for whom I’ll cast my vote on Tuesday (April 2nd at Town Hall in Stoneham!). So with no further ado…

Here’s the sample ballot, for your reference. I’m only highlighting my choices in contested races.

Select Board (pick two)
Heidi Bilbo (loved her “Hate has no home here” campaign)
George Seibold

School Committee
Rachel Meredith-Warren (I think she’s amazing)

Housing Authority
Michelle Meagher

Board of Assessors
Eric Josephson (I’ve seen his resume and he’s deeply qualified – we’ll be lucky to have him)

Question 1
Yes, I think if we want a thriving Main Street, we need to offer flexibility to proprietors

Mental zephyrs

I’ve been moody lately, for me. By moody, I mean that my general emotional tenor has not been logical or consistent based on external stimuli. Some days I’m just cranky as a bear with a sore tooth, while other days I’m Ms. Sunshine and Light. Today is a Sunshine and Light day. Wednesday? Bear needing a root canal.

This morning, as so often happens, my son climbed into bed to snuggle me. He even says, “snuggle”. He nestled into my arms, his butt against the bulge of his baby brother and his fuzzy-head at perfect kissable height and we drowsed there together for 10 minutes. How can that fail to bring joy to the heart? On a perfect clear October commute where the highway is lined with the slow fire of the dying year (really, the colors are magnificent this year), I listened to him discourse at length about whether Jesus had ever used bad words like “ca ca poo poo head” and gotten a time out.

One never knows just how much theology to teach a three year old. But I’m pretty sure the gospels are silent on Jesus’ use of the phrase “ca ca poo poo head”.

I remember part of why this stage of pregnancy is so tiring. You KNOW that you might have up to (by my count) 30 more days until you are holding an actual real baby. You know that the odds of going into labor today are very small. (Less than 1 in 30.) You know that likely you have a long hard slog ahead of you. And yet you think that maybe? Just maybe? And some of my friends are every so slightly more pregnant than I am and they are having labor pains and it’s days or hours until they will have babies and I could too! Or, well, it could be November.

Hm. What if I am in active labor on election day? Hm hm.

And thus you see the pattern of my thoughts, scattered high, low and in-between by the autumnal zephyrs like so many crisp new-fallen leaves.